Kenya’s 30% Rebate: Can Tax Breaks Buy a Film Industry?

Sep 18, 2025

Africa’s creative economy is full of promise, but promises alone do not build industries. They require cash, infrastructure, policy, and the kind of incentives that make global players look twice. Kenya is betting that its 20–30% film rebate scheme will be one of those incentives. But the question remains: can tax breaks alone buy a film industry, or do they simply rent one for a season?

What Exactly is a Film Rebate?

A film rebate is a financial incentive offered by governments to attract film and television productions. It typically means that a percentage of the money spent by foreign or local productions within a country is refunded—often in cash—after the shoot wraps and the expenses are audited.

In Kenya’s case, the government has promised rebates of 20% for standard productions and up to 30% for those that meet certain cultural or local content thresholds. That means if a production company spends $5 million filming in Nairobi, Kisumu, or the Maasai Mara, it could receive back as much as $1.5 million.

On paper, that looks like free money. In practice, rebates are meant to stimulate local economies, create jobs, and develop creative ecosystems. Every dollar spent on catering, transport, hotels, actors, crew, equipment rental, or location fees circulates within the local economy, boosting multiple industries.

Why Kenya Is Rolling the Dice

Kenya’s film industry has always had global potential but limited execution. Nairobi is home to one of Africa’s most skilled advertising sectors, countless independent filmmakers, and a vibrant storytelling tradition that stretches from oral histories to Netflix deals. Yet the infrastructure—financing, large-scale studios, distribution networks—remains underdeveloped.

By introducing this rebate scheme, Kenya is signaling a desire to compete with established African film hubs like South Africa (which offers rebates of up to 35%) and Morocco (30%), both of which have attracted blockbuster productions from Hollywood and Europe.

The hope is that if Netflix, Disney, or Amazon Prime can save millions by filming in Kenya, they will bring not just cameras but also opportunities—contracts for Kenyan crews, jobs for local actors, and visibility for the country as a global film destination.

The Global Rebate Game: Who’s Winning?

Kenya is entering a global race where rebates are not new, and competition is fierce.

South Africa has one of the continent’s most sophisticated rebate systems, offering 25–35% cash rebates for qualifying productions. This has made Cape Town and Johannesburg hotspots for international shoots, from Marvel’s “Avengers: Age of Ultron” to Netflix’s “Queen Sono.” The industry contributes over $300 million annually to South Africa’s economy and sustains thousands of jobs.
Morocco has leveraged its 30% rebate alongside centuries-old architecture and diverse landscapes to become a favorite for historical and action epics. “Game of Thrones,” “Gladiator,” and “Mission: Impossible – Rogue Nation” were all shot there, injecting millions into the local economy.
Canada pioneered aggressive rebate systems, with provinces like Ontario and British Columbia offering up to 70% combined rebates (when factoring in labor credits). This is why Toronto and Vancouver often stand in for New York or Los Angeles on screen. The result: Canada has a thriving production industry that generates billions annually.
The UAE offers up to 30% rebates through its Abu Dhabi Film Commission, successfully attracting productions like “Star Wars: The Force Awakens” and “Fast & Furious 7.” These films not only poured money into the local economy but also positioned Abu Dhabi as a premium global location.

In this context, Kenya’s rebate is competitive but not extraordinary. The real differentiator will not be the percentage but the execution—how fast the rebates are paid, how transparent the system is, and how well the infrastructure supports world-class production.

The Risks of Rebates

Rebates, however, are not magic bullets. Without a broader strategy, they risk becoming little more than expensive advertisements for foreign studios.

Short-term rentals, not long-term growth: A Hollywood production may film in Nairobi, collect the rebate, and leave—without leaving behind skills, technology transfer, or sustainable industry growth.
Delayed or unpaid rebates: Countries like Nigeria have struggled with policy implementation. If rebates are delayed, the entire scheme collapses in credibility. Producers will not risk millions on uncertain promises.
Local exclusion: If rebates mainly benefit foreign productions, local filmmakers may be locked out, unable to access the same scale of support. This deepens inequality within the industry.
Infrastructure mismatch: Rebates attract productions, but if the local industry lacks sound stages, post-production facilities, or skilled crew, foreign studios will import what they need—limiting local benefits.

Kenya’s Advantage: Culture and Geography

Despite these risks, Kenya has undeniable advantages. The country’s diverse landscapes—from savannahs and mountains to bustling urban centers—make it visually irresistible. Its rich cultural heritage and strong English-speaking population further boost its appeal to global studios.

Kenya is also a regional hub for advertising and branded content, with a creative workforce already attuned to high-quality production. This workforce could transition into film if given consistent opportunities.

Moreover, Kenya has a growing reputation in the documentary and short film space, with films like “Softie” (Sam Soko, 2020) and “The Letter” (2020) making waves internationally. A rebate system could amplify these successes into feature-length, globally distributed projects.

Lessons From Nigeria, Ghana, and Beyond

Kenya is not the only African nation trying to leverage policy for creative growth.

Nigeria has no formal film rebate system, but Nollywood thrives through volume, speed, and sheer grit. Its strength lies in domestic demand—a massive market that consumes local films voraciously. But Nigerian filmmakers also complain about the lack of infrastructure, weak IP protection, and limited government support.
Ghana has attempted tax incentives but with mixed results, often undermined by bureaucratic red tape. However, its proximity to Nigeria and growing interest in content hubs like Accra suggest that with the right push, Ghana could become a film powerhouse.
Rwanda has been experimenting with film-friendly policies and festivals, positioning itself as a niche hub for African cinema with international reach.

The key lesson: policy is not enough. Incentives must be paired with infrastructure, training, and distribution pipelines that outlive individual productions.

What Success Would Look Like for Kenya

If Kenya’s rebate scheme works, success won’t just be measured in the number of foreign productions. It will be seen in:

Local capacity building: Kenyan crews working alongside Hollywood veterans, gaining skills they can reinvest locally.
Industry spillovers: Growth in logistics, hospitality, and tourism as productions flock to Kenya.
Sustainable financing: Kenyan filmmakers accessing the rebate system for ambitious projects, not just outsiders.
Global visibility: Nairobi and the Maasai Mara becoming cinematic shorthand for Africa, much like Cape Town already is.

In short: a rebate scheme that plants roots, not just footprints.

The Bigger Picture: Beyond Rebates

The conversation around rebates often misses the larger point: rebates are not infrastructure. They are accelerants, not foundations.

To truly build a competitive film industry, Kenya will also need:

Studios and post-production houses that meet global standards.
Training programs for film professionals in editing, sound, VFX, and production management.
Clear IP protection laws to secure revenue streams.
Distribution networks that help Kenyan films travel beyond Africa.

Rebates can bring the spotlight, but without these structures, the lights go out as soon as the crew leaves.

The Final Word

So, can tax breaks buy a film industry? The answer is no—but they can rent global attention long enough to build one. Kenya’s 20–30% rebate is a bold step in the right direction, but it must be paired with long-term investments in creative infrastructure, education, and distribution.

If Kenya learns from South Africa’s execution and Morocco’s persistence, it could carve out a new lane in the global film economy. If not, it risks becoming another temporary backdrop for stories told by others.

In the end, the rebate is not the industry. It is the invitation. The real test is whether Kenya can turn the guests into permanent residents of its creative economy.

Thanks for reading! This post is public so feel free to share it.